Nuclear
energy is commonly offered as an alternative to overcome the circle of energy. The
debate of whether the use nuclear energy is an appropriate choice has not come
to an end. Some people agree with the utilization of it because of its
benefits. Some others, however, disagree because of its risks to the
environment.
Those
who agree with the operation of nuclear reactors usually argue that nuclear
energy is the only feasible choice to answer the ever-increasing energy needs. In
their opinion, the other sources of energy; oil, coal, and liquid natural gas
are not renewable and safe, while nuclear energy can be sustainably when
produced in a safe way.
However,
people who disagree with the use of nuclear energy point out that the waste of
nuclear products can completely destroy the environment and human lives. A meltdown
in a reactor, for example, usually results in the contamination of the
surrounding soil and water. Take for example, the blow up of the nuclear
reactor at the Chernobly Nuclear Power Station in Rusia twenty years ago. The serious
contamination imperiled people and the environment severely.
It
is obvious that nuclear energy should be avoided because it really endangers
the environment but what about a less polluted energy instead of nuclear
energy? Are there any alternative energies to overcome the crisis of energy?
(Taken
from: Th. M. Sudarwati and Eudia Grace. Look
Ahead 3. Jakarta: Erlangga)
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar